SWPA logo
    SWPA Image Scenes from SWPA 2013
in Ft Worth, TX
(more pictures in the
conference photo album).

About SWPA
Home / Mission
Origins & History
Governance & Bylaws
Contact Officers
Officer Guidelines
Donate to SWPA
SWPA e-Newsletters
Annual Conventions
Upcoming Convention
Convention Registration
Previous Conventions
Future Conventions
Resources
Psychology Organizations
Psych Depts in SW Region
Announcements & Postings
Publisher Links
Professional Development
Member / Non-Member
Membership Categories
Create New Profile
Edit Profile
Pay Dues and Registration
Submit Abstract
Login


SWPA States

Examination of Components of Interpersonal Threats to Public Identity
    Geronimo Perez Jr     Texas A & M University - Commerce
    Stephen M Reysen    


Introduction
An interpersonal threat to public identity is a situation where another person intentionally attempts to illegitimately undermine one’s ability to display a valued and distinctive public identity (Reysen & Katzarska-Miller, 2013). Copycatting, a situation in which a person intentionally copies distinctive and valued characteristics of another person's public identity, is a fitting example of an interpersonal threat to public identity (Reysen et al., 2012). In two studies, we examine three aspects of the definition of interpersonal threats to public identity.
Method
In Study 1, participants (N = 90) imagined that another person copies three aspects of their public identity (hairstyle, clothing, personality). We manipulated legitimacy of the copying (preparing for a role in the school play vs. not) and intention to harm the participant (role in play is either positive or negative). After reading the vignette participants rated felt anger. In Study 2 (N = 50), participants wrote about a fictitious meaningful or meaningless tattoo to highlight the value of the tattoo as a public identity characteristic. Participants then imagined someone copying the tattoo and rated felt anger.
Results
In Study 1, participants expressed the greatest degree of anger when the copying was illegitimate and intentional. In Study 2, participants expressed more anger to copying of an important (vs. unimportant) characteristic.
Discussion
The results support prior research (Reysen et al., 2012) showing the primary response to copycatting is anger. Furthermore, victims perceive the copying as illegitimate, intentional, and the copied public identity characteristic as valued. Together, the results support three components of the definition of interpersonal threats to public identity and copycatting as such a situation.





Privacy Statement
For website information, contact the Webmaster
Copyright © 2001-2014 Southwestern Psychological Association.
A grant to SWPA from the Science Directorate of the American Psychological Association to support the development and dissemination of an updated history of SWPA is gratefully acknowledged.